The sense that I got out of that was that a more rigid termination point on the bridge allows more energy to stay in the strings, increasing sustain. This would imply that some "energy" (in some form) passes through the strings to the bridge. I was wondering if the "before" and "after" graphs of actual measurements would be useful to this discussion. Do both theories predict the observed results? (Or do we need a better experiment?) I also thought it was interesting how they described "mechanical energy" being converted to "acoustical energy" at the bridge. Are these terms well-known? I don't want to muddy the semantic waters. --Cy Shuster-- Rochester, MN ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy Peters" <roy.peters@mindspring.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: January 24, 2002 9:49 PM Subject: Re: Sound waves(The behavior of soundboards) > Cy: > You were right. My liner notes agree with your liner notes. My hangup was on > the use of the word "resistor". It's a different way of thinking about it. > > Roy >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC