---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Roger Jolly wrote: > At 09:33 PM 5/13/2003 +0200, you wrote: > >> Roger, Ed, and Ron >> >> Ron Koval wrote: >> >> > Cool clue, ric! >> >> Grin... you liked that one eh ? The other one I was going to give >> was >> >> If you block the hammer from rising and put pressure on the key >> the neighboring hammers all drop significantly. >> > > Sounds like the balance rail is rolling. Check to see that it is > well secured to the cross slats. check to see if the slats flex. If > the mortice cut has been badly done made. It may be the cause of the > problem. Interesting... why would this cause flexing in the hammer rail only when key pressure puts heavy presure on the hammershank ?.. I will look tho today. > > > > >> > >> > So it seems that the bedding must be good if you don't get the same >> > symptom >> > with the hammer out of the equation..... >> >> I''ve checked and rechecked the bedding on this instrument 5 or 6 >> times. Darned things been driving me crazy :) Dags hold the back >> rail firm, front rail is as flat as you ever could want.... no.. its >> not the bedding. > > > The movement has to be balance rail related, unless the frame is > riding on the top of the unacorda arm. > Gee I would love to see this piano. Having a hard time visualising this. Why cant the hammer rail be just plain too flexible ? Believe me I would love to avoid putting in a new one. > Regards Roger > Cheers RicB -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/c4/cf/a4/85/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC