This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hi St=E9phane, Man , I like that!!! ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "St=E9phane Collin" <collin.s@skynet.be> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 6:34 PM Subject: Re: 1865 Style 2 S&S > I must second you in this, Ric. >=20 > But when you say "On the other hand, some might think that what it = looses in=20 > value as a piano, it gains in value as an antique.... ", I definately=20 > couldn't help saying that an antique instrument, well restored, can be = a=20 > good piano (I mean a good medium for an artist to output his poetry). > I hear you all thinking "oh my ! here he comes again !" > Just wanted to remind (sure, everyone knows that) that all the nice = and=20 > durable music for piano written before the late Franz Liszt was = written on=20 > such instruments here called antiques. I just can't believe that such = a=20 > great piano genius (I mean someone who proved to understand soo deeply = how=20 > to make a good vibration out of it) as Chopin was, would have been = satisfied=20 > with a poor instrument (or even could have developped his exceptional=20 > ability without it). And when I hear a good 1840 Pleyel nicely and=20 > respectfully restored, I get confirmation that Chopin was not dumb. > No, power of sound, speed of repetition, evenness of tone, length of=20 > sustain, etc. are not the only criteria for judging the quality of an=20 > instrument (to me at least, but who am I ?). They are just the = qualities of=20 > the standard instrument that we know. > Bloody standardization ! Never will I exchange a well maturated and=20 > appropriatedly selected bordeaux wine for a coke. >=20 > When I hear about redesigning a 1865 Steinway, I get the same feeling = as if=20 > some promoter would upgrade a cathedral into a disco, replacing the = stained=20 > glass by double glazing (for heating efficiency purposes). Still = impossible=20 > in my country. For how long ? >=20 > St=E9phane Collin. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> > To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 1:52 PM > Subject: Re: 1865 Style 2 S&S >=20 >=20 > > On the other hand, some might think that what it looses in value as = a=20 > > piano, it gains in value as an antique.... Then there is the = historic=20 > > instrument market, and as far as I can see, that is just going to = get=20 > > bigger and bigger as we get closer to Galapagos. > > > > just a thought > > > > RicB > > >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >=20 > ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/4e/02/a5/ca/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC