This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment David C. Stanwood wrote: >In this case it may be that the factory overdid it on the pre leading and had >to back lead to get the down weight on spec... > >David Stanwood > > > I doubt it... not Hamburg... but in the end who knows ? It would be interesting to find out if they would actually spot a static weight problem and decide to opt for this kind of a solution instead of simply remaking the key, or removing front lead and plugging accordingly. My gutt feeling tells me this is not Hamburgs style. Cheers RicB > > >>... but isn't it so that action with too low key inertia causes for the >>pianist problems to control his playing ? Isn't some inertia desirable, as >>it integers smoothly all the unequalities of the pianist's fingers ? As >>long as apparent weight at fast playing is reasonable, and repetition good >>enough, I would think that the more inertia, the better control (kind of : >>"you want that effect, so you have to move your fingers accordingly" rather >>than "hey, I didnt want that effect" occuring with too low key inertia >>actions). >> >>Or do I miss something again ? >> >>Stéphane Collin >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > > > ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/8b/10/66/16/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC