Fwd: [admin] pianotech post from cfaulk2@juno.com

[pianolover 88]

it sure looks as if the ORIGINAL configuration had traditional bridge pins, 
and the agraffes were substituted during modification.

Terry Peterson




----Original Message Follows----
From: Kent Swafford <kswafford@earthlink.net>
Reply-To: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org>
To: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org>
Subject: Fwd: [admin] pianotech post from cfaulk2@juno.com
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 18:49:07 -0600



Begin forwarded message:
>
>From: "Charles E. Faulk" <cfaulk2@juno.com>
>Date: February 20, 2004 11:08:32 PM CST
>To: pianotech@ptg.org
>Subject: Re: Sohmer Agraffe Bridges - Photos wanted! - was Re: what is 
>downbearing?
>
>
>David,
>
>Here's a picture of a Sohmer bridge.
>
>Charles Faulk
>


<< sohmer.jpg >>



>On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:03:44 -0500 David Skolnik 
><davidskolnik@optonline.net> writes:
>JimB-
>
>There always be a chance you be right, but I don't think this is that 
>time!!  Does  anyone have a good picture of an agraffe bridge that could be 
>posted to resolve this, soon to turn violent, debate?  Lacking such a 
>photo, anyone with a relevant model in front of them who would venture an 
>opinion?  As I am remembering, the net effect of this config was to put a 
>major ripple in the soundboard under the bridge.  The truth aside, what was 
>the thinking behind this anyway, and, if it worked, why did they stop?
>
>David Skolnik
_______________________________________________
pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives

_________________________________________________________________
Click, drag and drop. My MSN is the simple way to design your homepage. 
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200364ave/direct/01/