Thank you for explaining that to me, Arthur. I do not enjoy laboring under misconceptions. I agree that a properly regulated, classic reproducer is more exciting than the computer thingees which I've heard. But the overwhelming convenience of a simple CD over boxes and boxes of rolls makes the modern version more useful to the average consumer. Thump --- MarinoPiano@aol.com wrote: > RE: Lost motion. I remember that the plungers on > the PianoDisc were spring > loaded so that lost motion was taken care of. You > can also run a program from > the control box that adjusts the intensity of each > note indivudally to make a > nice even soft. I too have worked on may > reproducers from the past. Playing > discs that have been transfered from reproducing > rolls is almost as exciting.. > Keyword is ALMOST. > > There is really nothing like the sound of a well > rebuilt Steinway DuoArt > or Mason Ampico in my book. But I think I'm a bit > prejudice. > And I might add, happily so. > > Arthur Marino > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC