This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hi Terry et al, Duh! I hadn't considered the antique car analogy. And yes, you refine = the argument well regarding hard parts vs. soft parts. I would modify = the argument to "wear-and-tear" parts and "non-wear-and-tear" parts. = Wear-and-tear parts are, by definition, intended to be replaced. They = are expendable, like tires, belts, and hoses in a car -- or electric = brushes in motors -- or needles on Victrolas -- or tubes in radios -- or = paint on an old, Victorian house. Without the "wear and tear" parts = being replaced as needed, the antique becomes nonfunctional and = therefore less valuable. Automobiles come with a manufacturer's recommended maintenance schedule = -- i.e. when to change belts, hoses, etc. How about pianos? Has = *anyone* drawn up any guidelines as to the average service life of a = hammer or damper felt? (If so, I'm sure it's less than 100 years. This = piano is 99 years old.) Anyway, my friend and I will be sending the piano off to said young = musician before too long. It will come with my minimal recommendation = for a set of Ray's hammers, dampers, several new bass strings, a DC = system, and CA'ing of several problem tuning pins. I also want to = recommend a technician in her area -- Los Angeles. (Sorry it's on the = other side of the country, Terry!!) I would do this work myself, except = that I refuse to touch the piano again, after she got her nose in the = air that the last tuning wasn't done by a *professional*. (I thought = the tuning was pretty good. The Suzuki violin teachers agreed, as it = was their favorite in-home piano for accompanying the children during = lessons and recitals. Ah well...) Anyway, who would y'all recommend in = the Los Angeles area for this piano? Peace, Sarah PS Sentimental value really *is* worth something with this piano. It's = the piano on which she learned (second instrument) and started = composing. She's bonded with it. It's a karma thing to her, which is = understandable. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Farrell=20 To: Pianotech=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 7:02 AM Subject: Re: How do we tell customers that the work done on = theirpianosstinks? I run into this quite often. I use the car analogy to describe how = pianos wear out. I also point out how pianos differ from antique cars = that are "all original". The reasons a restored 1962 Corvette with all = original parts and matching serial numbers is worth anything is because = there are not any cars made like them anymore and mostly because there = are many car clubs around where folks get together and show off their = cars, etc., etc. A 1902 or a 1962 or a 2002 Steinway or Bechstein or whatever uprights = or grands don't look a whole lot different from one another. There are = no piano clubs/magazines, etc. that attracts antique piano collectors, = etc. An antique piano has no intrinsic value. The only way an "antique" = piano has any value is usually if Harry Truman or Glenn Gould owned it, = or maybe if it is very unusual in some unique way. Then give them an appraisal of the wholesale value of their piano: = less than zero. Give them a retail value of their piano: zero to $500 = depending on cosmetics (does it have all the keytops) and whether all = the keys work. That usually does it. If they still don't believe you, then perhaps = they just need to hear the same thing from another qualified technician. Now you need to focus on these original parts - parts replacement. The = "all original" restored 1962 Corvette has all its original metal and = fiberglass parts (not even that actually - it could have a new = alternator, etc., etc. - just the original "type") but all the = SOFT/ORGANIC parts have been replaced with new. The seat covers and = radiator hoses and brake lines are all new - they were not made by = Chevrolet. The piano is the same way. The "hard parts", i.e. the parts = that don't wear out or deteriorate on their own can stay - the case, = plate, frame, keybed, etc. But the SOFT/ORGANIC parts that wear need to = be replaced if you want it to look/perform like new - hammers, action = parts, strings (not soft or organic, but you can replace with original = type), soundboard and whatever. Only for a museum restoration is there any reason to try and preserve = everything in its original state. But keep in mind that is done for = historical preservation only - not to make something work for everyday = use. If that doesn't work. Walk away - its hopeless! BTW, IMHO those old Knabes are among the finest, if not the finest, = uprights ever built - premium remanufacturing stock! Ya might even want = to tell her you know someone in the business....... ;-) Terry Farrell ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/34/f2/aa/ae/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC