SAT Scores on Tuning Exam

[Andrew and Rebeca Anderson]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Joe,
Have you used a verituner?  I've disagreed with it before and tried 
re-tuning aurally only to discover that it had made the best 
compromise available from the beast in front of me.  It works with 
the partials of each note it tunes as opposed to using only the 
partials of three sampled notes from the piano.  You can choose the 
degree of stretch you want to use.

The tolerances in the portion you can use your ETD on are quite 
generous.  The aural section is tight, but you can't use your ETD 
there anyway and that is the mental muscle you have to develop.  The 
Verituners measured tuning and detune functions are quite useful to 
practice doing temperaments with.

While I'm no CTE, I have checked it out at my leisure and have been 
quite satisfied with what it does.

Andrew
At 11:44 PM 9/12/2005, you wrote:
>So I just checked with Michael Kimbell, our San Francisco CTE and tunin=
>g examiner and he concurred with my statement.
>David ,
>Then Michael is on Drugs, IMO.
>The simple fact remains, that the Test Instrument is tuned Aurally, 
>by at least Three tuners, one of which must be a CTE. Since the 
>piano is tuned Aurally, there is no way in hell, the SAT will 
>reproduce this! I'm sure if you check with Paul Brown, he'll tell 
>you that exams, of record, do not bear out this B.S.! As for the 
>claims of Reyburn and Verituner...That smatters of the "Diaphramatic 
>Soundboard" B.S. that we so blatantly poo poo, on this list almost 
>every day. Sales Hype, IMO.
>Joe Garrett, R.P.T.
>Captain, Tool Police
>Squares R I


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/f5/ea/af/69/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--