It seems to me that choices for rebuilding have to take into consideration all those things you mention. The piano must have enough inherent value as perceived by the ultimate buying public if you hope to recoup the money you've speculatively put into the piano. Even then, margins are not huge. That isn't to say that in reality you are not by virtue of the design work adding value to an otherwise less valuable instrument. Whether you can convince a buyer of that is another story. Other than that, the rim and the plate have to be two key criteria in deciding whether the piano has potential. I'm redoing a 6'4" Knabe from the 1920s at the moment and it has a very solid rim and good plate--tremendous rebuilding potential in those pianos. With a new soundboard and bridge design, new key set and action I'm sure it will be a phenomenal piano, much better than the original and as good as anything with greater fallboard recognition. Again, whether a potential buyer will be able to judge the piano on its own merit remains to be seen. David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net www.davidlovepianos.com -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hull Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 10:26 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Rebuilder's Gallery Pianos I am thinking over the Rochester Rebuilder's Gallery situation and coming up with some questions I would like to kick around. These aren't exactly new topics (are there any?) but I would still like to hear what you think. What brands of pianos were represented? Steinway, Overs, Mason & Hamlin and Chickering? Is this list right? Most of the pianos were Steinways. Was this coincidence? I thought all of the pianos exhibited a high level of craftsmanship and sounded great. Thank you for bringing these fine instruments and for sharing so freely with us all! However, why was there not a greater variety of brands in the mix? Is it due to the high resale value of used Steinways? Marketing and fallboarditis? Name recognition? Is it due to the quality of the original structure which adds quality also to the result of the rebuild? Wouldn't it be interesting to see what can be done with other brands, maybe some that would offer a greater challenge in bringing about improvements? Can you say that a particular aspect (probably one that is unchangeable) of a piano is the most determining factor in how well a rebuild will turn out? Rim quality? Bob Hull __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC