Les, I have a Fujan and like it quite well. However, I also have a homemade lever made with a Jahn 5º head. For some applications, it works better than the Fujan. Particularly, with the jerk or impact method of tuning. I prefer the Fujan when I'm doing a smooth pull method. And it feels to me that the extra mass of my homemade lever does better with the impact method (not to mention that it would also scientifically calculate to less effort with that method). I'm theorizing that the lighter levers might be preferred by the primarily smooth pull tuners. Which leads me to ask other Fujan users: Are any of you fellow finicky feisty foppish Fujan aficionados mainly smooth pull tuners? Or, do some of you primarily use the impact method with the Fujan? -- JF On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Leslie Bartlett <l-bartlett at sbcglobal.net>wrote: > I'm not "in" on this discussion, but I have made my own hammers out of a > Schaff rod with a bit of stainless welded to the end, and they are light and > plenty stiff. There's a local tech who uses the Jahn exclusively and has > sung its praises while cursing the 15-degree head. I caught him one day and > showed him the junk I use, so he wanted to try it. "Wow," said he. "That > feels really nice." The guy has a masters in piano performance, and is the > best tech at the biggest store in town. So, there are working alternatives > to the very expensive hammers. I think I have about $20 dollars in mine, > including the $1.95 ball on the end. I carry two of them, plus one of the > "midget" extension things, and go back and forth, using often all three in a > single tuning. When working a difficult tuning my brain and arms go a bit > more nuts than usual and I need the change which the switch off brings. > les bartlett > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20080824/da9d0427/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC