I'm pretty sure I got it right. As Del presented it in his workshop, the two work against each other. Where you need more mass you also need less stiffness. How do you make it heavier but more flexible? Where you need less mass, you need more stiffness. How do you increase stiffness without increasing the mass? Think of it this way, which requires more air movement, A0 or C8? Which requires a greater excursion of the board? The frequency that requires a larger movement of the board will also require minimal mass, as mass by definition is the quality that impedes acceleration. (A0 is my pick) And as has been discussed here before a quick fix to improve high frequency sustain is to add mass. Also, which frequency produces a larger sound pressure wave? It is the one that will require a more rigid panel, i.e., more surface area to produce the larger pressure wave. (again, A0 is my pick) This stiff panel will need flexibility at the edges so it can make its deflections, hence the concept of "floating" the board at the bass end. Dean Dean May cell 812.239.3359 PianoRebuilders.com 812.235.5272 Terre Haute IN 47802 -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Richard Brekne Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:36 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Compression ridges was :Do you dry the ribs, along with the board,prior to gluing ? "Stiffness is desired in the high treble but what about the bass where flexibility seems to rule? " According to Del (and I believe it) high mass and high flexibility isdesired for treble. High stiffness and low mass is desired for bass. Low bass frequencies require a very rigid moving panel. If the panel is not rigid it absorbs all the energy before pumping out the fundamental frequency. Dean Er... I believe you have it backwards Dean. Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC