OK, let me reword that then. Other than the mechanical problems of stabilizing string segments, I see no reason that the piano won’t stain in tune for any shorter period of time than one not requiring a pitch correction. In other words, I don’t see anything inherent in the “physics” of the piano that would support the idea that a piano undergoing a “radical” pitch correction cannot achieve stability in a single sitting. Which was the original question, I think… David Love www.davidlovepianos.com From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 8:52 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] PR follow up This is a great reply and drifting toward the answer if there is one, if there was ever a clear question. I find it questionable, however, to say, "I see no reason that the piano won’t stay in tune for any shorter a period of time than one not requiring a pitch correction". This seems totally counterintuitive and is one of the reasons for the original query. P In a message dated 8/28/2009 10:43:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time, davidlovepianos at comcast.net writes: However, short of string segment equalization problems (and given a stable environment) I see no reason that the piano won’t stay in tune for any shorter a period of time than one not requiring a pitch correction—I guess that’s become the mode of comparison. The bottom line is that the more you go over the piano the more likely you are to catch and correct any stubborn segments. The tendency for the segments to be stubborn will be influenced by the piano’s design, counterbearing angles, string condition, etc.. _____ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20090828/eee5db86/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC