You're correct, they sure do appear very close. I had never been exposed to Red Spruce previously. Thanks for enlightening me! Terry Farrell On Jul 31, 2010, at 8:47 AM, jimialeggio wrote: > >> Well, Sitka is preferable because it is the highest strength/weight >> ratio wood out there. > > yes, thats correct...or maybe that's correct. Look at the strength/ > weight #'s from FPL handbook chapter 4 pg 13 > > > > > sitka spruce > red spruce > specific grav > .40 > .40 > moe > 1.57 > 1.61 > compression parallel > 5610 > 5540 > compression perp > 580 > 550 > sheer parralell > 1150 > 1290 > > > ...pretty darn close I'd say. > > But the point I was trying to make is not that Sitka is "better" > than Red, or Red is "better" than Sitka, but rather if you design > with a particular wood in mind, and your design accommodates the > nature of that wood, it'll work. For me designing for a local > indigenous species which can be sawn by local sawmill, artisans who > are guys like us, makes sense to me, especially since sitka > availability in my area is a pain. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20100701/d11eac8a/attachment-0001.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC