I thought the article was very well presented and fairly readable. In fact I was initially intrigued and pulled into the material right off the bat with the discussion of setting the A3. I kept waiting for a resolution to my puzzlement as to how the A3's placement would be resolved. I was very perplexed when the whole temperament sequence was established and then some checking was begun. But all was well when we got to the second paragraph of page six. I just would feel more familiar with proving the octave setting of one of the cornerstone contiguous Major thirds right off the bat, thank you. I do think this not counting beats approach is fairly well covered in Randy Potter's course under his "Potter II temperament" sequence. Yes, no? The piano is actually telling you how to set the stretch without a mechanical counting of anything - just listening. Joseph Alkana RPT (Retired) -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Duaine Hechler Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:59 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Tuning a temperament without counting beats Well, I started to read this, keeping an open mind and try to understand it .........
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC