[pianotech] Hammers or duplex?

Jeannie Grassi jcgrassi at earthlink.net
Wed Jun 2 08:29:31 MDT 2010


Hi Ron,
What do you consider "long" duplexes?  
Jeannie Grassi, RPT
Bainbridge Island, WA

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Nossaman [mailto:rnossaman at cox.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 8:41 PM
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Hammers or duplex?

Joe Wiencek wrote:
> This subject was heatedly debated recently, 

With one individual providing all the heat, yes.

>that is, which is the source 
> of extraneous noise, poorly mated hammers, or issues relating to duplex 
> length?  

The long front duplex lengths are the problem. Poorly mated 
hammers/strings will most certainly produce phasing noises 
elsewhere, but the short duplexes won't make noise however 
badly mated the hammers/strings. Nor will the long front 
duplex lengths necessarily become quiet however perfectly the 
hammer/string mating is accomplished.


>I just want to throw out another question, because I'm not a 
> scientist.  What about upright pianos?  Even with poorly shaped hammers, 
> I don't encounter too much noise in uprights?  Any one with more 
> empiricism care to comment?

Uprights don't have long front duplex segments. That's it.
Ron N



-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 505 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message



More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC