[pianotech] postponed list death

[William Monroe]

Right.  The PTG provides and maintains the list, emphasizing my point.  Why
should non-members have a say in the disposition of the list?  It doesn't
mean their contributions are not worthwhile, but I just can't understand
why organizational decisions should be directed by those outside the
organization.  Can you suggest a logical reason it should be so?

WRM




On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Ron Koval <drwoodwind at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> >From William R Monroe:
> <snip>I'm just growing weary of all the complaints from folks who refuse
> to be on PTG-L<snip>
> Interesting take on the issue of communication to the people on the list
> about whenthe list will be killed.
>
> In case you forgot: (from "about this list")
> The "pianotech" list, provided as a community service by the Piano
> Technicians Guild, is a forum for piano technicians. The list resides on
> the PTG server and is maintained by the PTG, but the PTG does not control
> the content in any way. The "pianotech" list is an open list, allowing
> anyone to subscribe or submit posts.
> The same cannot be said about PTG-L(and I AM subscribed to that list -
> there are others on pianotech that can't)
> Ron Koval
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20111212/e0581151/attachment.htm>