One dilutes the other, as I see it. With the collective subscribers splitting between two systems, or subscribing to both, it gets very confusing. Additionally, it will gobble up even more resources to administer two systems. I firmly believe we need to settle on one workable system, whatever that may be. William R. Monroe On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Ryan Sowers <tunerryan at gmail.com> wrote: > I mostly agree with this, William. > > However, this situation is akin to coming into a client's home and > adjusting the touch and tone on their piano only to get a call back that > they liked it better before. So even though the technician may see it as an > improvement, the user now no longer enjoys their instrument. > > I don't see why the two systems cannot operate side by side each catering > to a different subset of the membership. Why does it have to be one or the > other? > > Ryan Sowers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20110309/c43594da/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC