[pianotech] the fate of pianotech (OT?)

[Terry Beckingham]

Right on Ron

Terry Beckingham

At 10:38 AM 5/31/2012 -0500, you wrote:
>On 5/31/2012 9:55 AM, Encore Pianos wrote:
>>I'll try to make my point simply.  I think a study committee should be
>>formed to seek a good quality replacement for both Pianotech and the Higher
>>Logic program.
>
>This is the very best attitude they could hope for. It makes it dead easy 
>for them to justify dumping Mailman. They bought HL on their own authority 
>and dumped it on us without consideration or recourse, because they wanted 
>it. That won't change until they decide it was a mistake from their own 
>perspective and by their own criteria.
>
>
>>Pianotech is very long in the tooth and can't be expected to
>>last forever.
>
>So they keep telling us over and over and over. It seems to be working 
>because now you're telling us the same thing over and over and over, 
>supporting their position in their minds.
>
>This is, yet again, why I originally suggested and continue to suggest 
>that HL be made to, in ADDITION to any other "features" it has that may 
>actually work, at LEAST replicate all the functions of the Mailman list. 
>We would lose nothing in functionality, and Mailman could go. What I don't 
>understand is this psychotic administrative group reaction to suggesting 
>that HL should be made to at least meet the functionality of Mailman. The 
>severe negative reaction to the suggestion is far out of proportion to the 
>suggestion itself, which I considered the only sensible approach from the 
>beginning.
>
>Ron N