[pianotech] How to combine Google group emails

[Bill Fritz]

I'll have to say that I liked pianotech, because it combined several emails into one for me to review...  (1 look-see vs 3-10 separate ones)

Is there a way to accomplish that in the Google groups?

Bill Fritz, St Louis



From:
Ed Foote <a440a at aol.com>

To:
pianotech at ptg.org

Subject:
Re: [pianotech] The demise of pianotech list

Date:
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:11:26 -0400 (EDT)


Y'all are complaining about a tool like it had a personality. The forced change of exchange is unwelcome, but so is hair loss, and really doesn't make much difference in the big picture.  The corporate decision is just like a curve in the road, it is only really a problem for those that don't want to turn the wheel. 
  I hate changing over, I am a technophobe. More comfortable with arcane glues and testing ways of making sealing wax than recognizing an ISP number , whatever that is. I don't know what the 12 steps are for technophobia, but maybe, just maybe, going through the rigamarole of addresses, menus, settings, all of which make me want to scream and throw things, (I don't), I will at least keep things looking and working the same, even if it is through a different channel. 
  It seems that the Google+ thing makes my mailbox look just like it does on this pianotech forum. I sent the empty email, got something back, and now I get postings in my email just like I did before. It seems that Jim Moy has got a handle on how it all works, and he appears to occasionally lift some lost lamb from the cyberfog, setting the buttons appropriately , and leaving them once again plugged in and 'debating' with the technical peer group we all recognize, even if we can't define it. 
 
  The water is fine, and the sharks don't bite. might blow up your computer, but probably not. 
 
Ed Foote RPT 
http://www.piano-tuners.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20130320/d62203ed/attachment.htm>