[CAUT] lacquer

Chris Solliday solliday@ptd.net
Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:00:04 -0500


I chose door number one, it doesn't matter
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred Sturm" <fssturm@unm.edu>
To: "College and University Technicians" <caut@ptg.org>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: [CAUT] lacquer


> On 12/6/04 7:52 AM, "Chris Solliday" <solliday@ptd.net> wrote:
>
> > Good "point" David and I think it is the solids within that we are
trying to
> > build up  under the strike point that gives us the bang and other
qualities
> > associated with SSNY. There is no need for anything anywhere else in the
> > hammer. Voicing with needles or adding keytop and acetone (if one has
used
> > acetone as a thinner with the lacquer to begin with) can get us where we
> > need to be on stage quickly and easily. Happy accu-puncturing, Chris
> > Solliday
>     So, Chris, are you saying that "you don't need anything elsewhere"
> (meaning it doesn't make any difference, so why bother), or that not
having
> anything elsewhere actually gives better results than soaking the entire
> hammer? If so, what's the difference? Greater range of color?
>
> Regards,
> Fred Sturm
> University of New Mexico
>
> _______________________________________________
> caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>
>



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC