Totally agree here ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Love" <davidlovepianos@comcast.net> To: "'College and University Technicians'" <caut@ptg.org> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 3:10 PM Subject: RE: [CAUT] lacquer > Just to clarify what I was saying. I soak the hammer from the top down > to the top of the wood moulding. It usually wicks out to the shoulders > anyway, but the key area is underneath the crown. > > David Love > davidlovepianos@comcast.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of > Fred Sturm > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:01 PM > To: College and University Technicians > Subject: Re: [CAUT] lacquer > > On 12/6/04 7:52 AM, "Chris Solliday" <solliday@ptd.net> wrote: > > > Good "point" David and I think it is the solids within that we are > trying to > > build up under the strike point that gives us the bang and other > qualities > > associated with SSNY. There is no need for anything anywhere else in > the > > hammer. Voicing with needles or adding keytop and acetone (if one has > used > > acetone as a thinner with the lacquer to begin with) can get us where > we > > need to be on stage quickly and easily. Happy accu-puncturing, Chris > > Solliday > So, Chris, are you saying that "you don't need anything elsewhere" > (meaning it doesn't make any difference, so why bother), or that not > having > anything elsewhere actually gives better results than soaking the entire > hammer? If so, what's the difference? Greater range of color? > > Regards, > Fred Sturm > University of New Mexico > > _______________________________________________ > caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > > > _______________________________________________ > caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC