Proof accepted, though some assortment of scars, cigars, tattoos, or body piercings would have added credibility. But you still have to break those strings. Nice graphics and lighting though. DavidS At 05:27 PM 1/11/2007, you wrote: >Here's proof I am not a wimp.. > >(you'll love this, Skolnik...) > >[] > >On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:42 PM, David Skolnik wrote: > >>Michelle >> >>Now there, don't get bent. That was "child", as in >>"honey-child". That, and your tender years, or ears. >> >>As far as WIMP, well, if you want to really dispel that >>appellation, you could go to the limit with Ed Sutton's advice: >> >>>Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:35:16 -0500 (EST) >>>From: <mailto:ed440 at mindspring.com>ed440 at mindspring.com >>>Subject: Re: [CAUT] huge pitch raise question >>> >>>A good experiment is to intentionally break strings on a piano >>>that's going to be junked. WEAR EYE PROTECTION. Tune a string as >>>unison with it's upper neighbor, and the next upper neighbor, and the next.... >> >>You can really show'um...pull up those strings on a good piano, and >>don't wear eye protection. Yeah, now who's a wimp, eh? >> >>David S >>Urtext edition. All smilies expunged >> >> >> >> >> >>At 10:41 AM 1/11/2007, you wrote: >>>Awwright now. >>>That's it.. >>> >>>So far I've been called "jerk", now "child" and someone very >>>important in this group (and to me) even called me a... (prepare >>>yourself..) WIMP. >>> >>>:( >>> >>>I will only admit to being a jerk- and there's PLENTY of you on here >>>I see. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070112/10f29c97/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 114abadb.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 80599 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070112/10f29c97/attachment-0001.jpg -------------- next part --------------
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC