On 11/26/07 12:38 PM, "Richard Brekne" <ricb at pianostemmer.no> wrote: > Hi folks. > > Just ran into this instrument tonite... couldnt help myself so I bought > it on the spot. Wont say for how much as I really dont know whether > I've paid too much or got it cheap. Its functional but will need quite > a bit of work to come up to snuff. Pin block is more or less shot and I > suppose the old board really has seen far better days. Looks very nice tho. > > The thing is from 1850 or so... serial number 18XXX > > http://www.pianostemmer.no/images/Pleyel.jpg > > > Anyone having any good words of advice for me please be sure to share > them either in public or in private. > > Cheers > RicB > Hi Ric, If you have second thoughts, send it over here. I'd love to have it. Not sure I could afford the shipping, though <G>. I'll put in a word for retaining the existing action and its various specs, as in ratio and weight (rebuild parts as needed, and replicate hammer weight/denstity). And string it with Pure Sound. I had a wonderful experience with a Pleyel from, I think, the early 20th century, 190-200 cm or so, this past May. Playing on it was a revelation, and I have played on thousands of instruments. I found I was able to simply "sing with my fingers," it was so easy to create subtle expressive shadings. Foreground/background, little crescendos and diminuendos, accents wherever I wanted them. I tried to analyze why (unfortunately I was a tourist, and lacked anything to take any measurements, besides being in the situation of a guest of a family, with very limited time and oppportunity), and came to the tentative conclusion that it was a combination of low hammer weight (strike weight, if you will) and high ratio. Whatever I would normally do on a modern American piano was magnified. At any rate, best of luck in restoring it to glory. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC