The statement in Kent´s article that can be easily misinterpeted if taken out separately from the article: "Stopper claims that PureTuner in effect does not care about inharmonicity" This statement is true in the one and only sense, that the user must not evaluate the individual inharmonicity curve before the tuning process. The correct standalone-possible statement about inharmonicity treatment of PureTuner software Kent gave also, expresses the direct opposite (you probably read the article?): "Stopper claims that PureTuner deals with inharmonicity in a new way that is automatic" Bernhard Stopper Am 03.03.2009 um 23:52 schrieb Richard Brekne: > ..... and if you stop and think about the consequences of not > compensating for individual instrument inharmonicity you will > quickly see that that claim cant hold water either. In fact Kent > quotes Stopper saying exactly that. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20090304/ae67b71e/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC