[CAUT] Humidity control

[Jeff Tanner]

Hi Dennis,
I didn't mean it isn't appropriate to rely on them. If they're willing, that's great. But if they're among the few who "aren't going to bother with it - for whatever reasons", I was providing what that reason is.

Discussing teamwork and community, we still have our individual functions in that community, and we're individually paid for those specific functions. When some of us are having to do the jobs of others, then somebody is understaffed, and that masks that reality.

Jeff
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dennis Johnson 
  To: caut at ptg.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 12:12 PM
  Subject: Re: [CAUT] Humidity control



  Hi-

  I'm beginning to agree that at this point the dehumidifer only systems are probably best for locations difficult to monitor, and considering just unplugging humidifers to some of our systems for the summer.  I disagree however that it's not appropriate to rely on faculty help to keep up with the pianos in their own studios.  It isn't that big a  deal and clearly is in their interest to do this.  I've never had a single faculty object to the idea, but naturally a few aren't going to bother with it- for whatever reasons.  I believe it's a reasonable connection to foster between instrument and player.  Every case is different though.  There is a lot of discussion here about teamwork and community, so I try and connect with that.  

  The reservoir sounds like an interesting idea Roger.  Will the prototype be at Vegas?

  thanks,

  Dennis Johnson

  _______________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100504/7444b215/attachment.htm>