I for one agree. Any CAUT endorsement should be open to all PTG members. The RPT could and should be marketed separately. Institutions can still be encouraged to hire RPTs and CAUT credentialed members. Chris Solliday From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of tannertuner Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:47 PM To: caut at ptg.org Subject: Re: [CAUT] Preaching to the choir; Where it is a problem lies in our claim to be the only organization in the US that certifies piano technicians. If we look at a tech who has been through all four sections of both the Little Red Schoolhouse and Steinway, but say, "well, he hasn't passed our exams, so we cannot endorse his skills for CAUT work," those who are doing the hiring are going to completely disregard anything else the PTG has to say. Jeff _____ From: Dennis Johnson <johnsond at stolaf.edu> To: Jeff Tanner <tannertuner at bellsouth.net>; "caut at ptg.org" <caut at ptg.org> Sent: Wed, May 12, 2010 9:49:32 PM Subject: Re: [CAUT] Preaching to the choir; The Caut endorsement may or may not be able to recognize other training programs, but I don't understand this as a problem. People can be endorsed by more than one program. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100514/54ad9305/attachment-0001.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC