Ed Hilbert wrote: >>Someone earlier drided the swing test saying that he preferred the guage for measuring hammer flange tightness. I would disagree. Since the weight of the hammers graduates from one end to the other, having the same resistance on each flange will not give the same response withing the action. On the other hand, if all hammers swing the same number of swings on the swing test, than the resistance within the flanges has also been graduated to match the weight of the hammers. That's an automatic match.<< I have some thoughts: - What do you mean by matching? What do you mean by "same response within the action?" It does not seem logical to me that heavier hammers should have increased friction in the hammer center. This only compounds the drawback of uneven touch throughout the scale. Where is the benefit of "matching" increased mass with increased friction? - If you measure total action friction in the bass vs. the treble in a grand action, the friction is already greater in the bass, even with the hammer center friction being equal throughout. Why increase the friction still more in the bass? Does this additional friction give anything to the pianist? One could argue that added dampening of the hammer motion might help make key / hammer bounce on release more consistent throughout the scale. I don't agree that this slight potential benefit in bass repetition would justify the increased resistance cause by the added friction, especially since other action friction is already higher on the bass. - The most critical hammer centers for tight control of the hammer motion (meaning no sloppiness in the hammer center) is the mid-treble area, where maximum tone is required from a somewhat weak area of the scale. If the friction is tight enough for good tone there, that is plenty of control for the bass hammers. In other words, the higher mass of the bass hammers does not demand as much control of the parts as the higher tonal demands placed on the action in the critical mid-treble. An exception might be in an action with poor quality (spongy) bushing cloth, but that can be dealt with in other ways. - Can you name a manufacturer who uses a tapered friction approach? It could be done, just as thinned shanks and graduated repetition springs are common practice. Don Mannino 74473.624@compuserve.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC