SAT vs RCT reply

[James Grebe]

Hi John,
In my post I was trying to say that whatever device you get you will be able
to do a great job of tuning.  The point is that you need to learn whatever
device you get to its' full potential and the road to that potential is
interesting.  You will not go wrong with the SAT or RCT.
James Grebe
R.P.T. of the P.T.G
pianoman@inlink.com
Creator of Handsome Hardwood Caster Cups and Practical Piano Peripherals in
St. Louis, MO
-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodrow <John.Woodrow@aus.dupont.com>
To: pianotech@ptg.org <pianotech@ptg.org>
Date: Monday, September 28, 1998 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: SAT vs RCT


>>>
>Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 16:14:20 -0700
>From: fndango@azstarnet.com
>Subject: Re: SAT vs RCT
>
>I was a SOT user, I'm a SAT user now, and I've ordered a SAT III,
>(cut)
> I pray for a cease fire in the SAT/RCT "Features War."
>
>Bob Anderson
>Tucson, AZ
><<
>
>Bob & List,
>As many of you have already made a decision regarding SAT III or RCT, it is
>understandable that this current thread may not be of interest to you.
>However, as I (and probably many others) have yet to make a decision either
>way and plan to do so in the near future, I find this thread very
>interesting and highly informative.
>
>As we are talking 'new improved features' regarding the SAT v's RCT, past
>discussions and debates aren't relevant.  Due to my geographic location
>(Newton, is isolation a better word) it is virtually impossible to make
>comparisons of each machines features, or find a base of users to discuss
>in person.  As I am in the position of relying totally on a discussion such
>as this to help me make a decision, it is of tremendous value to me.
>
>As the recent comparisons of SAT/RCT/Tunelab in the Journal did not really
>assist me, I for one look forward to any additional comments, comparisons,
>strengths/weaknesses of each machine on the list.  Naturally, I trust that
>these points (and counter points) can be discussed in a factual and non
>emotive manner.
>
>Again, I feel this is a VERY IMPORTANT thread and should be continued if
>someone has something to add.
>
>I feel sure I cannot be alone in holding this point of view.
>
>Regards,
>John Woodrow
>Sydney, Australia (ICM)
>