This came as a surprise to me when I started using RCT several weeks ago. I was led to believe that RCT would improve my tunings greatly over what I could do aurally, so it was demoralizing to finish a tuning and think, "Whoa! I don't like this at all!" I suppose this is covered in the manual that comes with the software, but I am having trouble taking the time to read it all. Does it work, after the tuning is calculated, to just do a couple octaves aurally in the tenor break area and follow RCT for the rest? Or are there other helpful hints? (Oh, yes, the piano in question was definitely scale-challenged! :-)) Clyde Hollinger, RPT Lititz, PA Alan McCoy wrote: > 5. Bass/tenor break and related scale-challenged pianos: I'm not sure there is > a clear winner here either. You just can't stop using your ears and the > computer between your ears. Some pianos just require unacceptable compromises - > either there is a glitch in the thirds and sixths, or the octaves, fifths, and > fourths are terrible, or all of the above. The SAT uses the 4th partial and 6:3 > octaves into the bass, and RCT lets you choose the 3rd or 4th partial and the > 5th or 6th partial. I have tried both. If there is an advantage here I believe > it is with RCT because you can choose your poison. With both machines you have > to devise some method of compromise. I can't stand bad octaves or bad fifths so > I tend to favor them, but in so doing my thirds don't progress smoothly (what > the hell - some pianos just have outrageous glitches!) For this region of the > scale it is often simplest to just do it by ear rather than with either > machine.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC