Dear List, I'm finishing up on a Steinway 1883 Model F (older brother to K), swapping damper levers and double flanges. If I'd been able to convince the owner to install new butts as well, I wouldn't have to worry about the mismatch of the 1883 buts and the Tokiwa double flanges. The new are slightly wider (not a problem) However, the space into which the half-bird's eye and butt plate slip into the front of the double flanges H-shape. 0.020" narrower the new double flange than the old. I'm going to be able to shave the 20 mils off manually, using a machinist vice, an adjustable parallel slightly narrower than the thickness of the flange, and my freshly sharpened felt knife. The height of the adjustable parallel is set as a reference, so that the flange when set on its side on the parallel in the jaws, will sit high enough so that the flange leg will be 20 mils proud above the tops of the jaws. The felt knife runs along the top of the jaws, levering downwards on the bevel of its grind. (Yes, you have to keep track of the grain even when shaving off this thin a peal. DAMHIK) But I'm curious. Has anybody tried to slim down a flange leg(?), say a specified and uniform 20 mils. Certainly a milling machine, but few of us have that. How about a table saw (sliding fence jig)? A router table (once again a sliding jig)? An over-arm router would nice. A 1" saw blade mounted in a Dremel miniature milling machine? Also, it helps when your confirming the compatibility of the new and old parts to check with more than just the eyeballs. I'm not happy about disturbing those damper levers (and the regulation based thereon). Bill Ballard RPT NH Chapter, P.T.G. "When writing a mental note, first procure a mental piece of paper" ............mental graffitti +++++++++++++++++++++
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC