I agree David. Tho I think Horace is saying that if hammers have been treated very carefully either way... then there is a certain degree of leeway left both ways. Thats probably true as far as it goes and for what its worth. But the sad fact is that most times hammers when first soaked are really and truly soaked. Heck, half the hammers you buy are already completly soaked down in the battery area. Point being very much what you cite below. Lacquer destroys the hammers ability to release its tension when directionally towards the crown, and hammers that dont have this tension to begin with are in that perspective already destroyed from the get go. Cheers RicB David Love wrote: >While I agree that an overneedled hammer will not respond in the same way, >you can usually tap some reserve out of a tensioned hammer by needling down >near the staple--battery needling, I think Andre O. refers to it. I must >say that I have never seen a hammer such as a Renner or Abel hammer, one >that is designed to be voiced with needles rather than lacquer, and that >has been lacquered, respond by getting louder or brighter when needling in >the shoulder. The application of lacquer on these types of hammers usually >ruins them. Nor have I seen a lacquered hammer (one that is designed to be >lacquered) get brighter or louder with needling. If you want that type of >hammer to get louder, you have to add more juice (or mass). > >David Love >davidlovepianos@earthlink.net > > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC