Weight is about the same? Compared to the SAT III? I don't think so... David Ilvedson, RPT Pacifica, CA 94044 ----- Original message ---------------------------------------- From: wimblees at aol.com To: pianotech at ptg.org Received: 12/27/2009 2:37:00 PM Subject: Re: [pianotech] SAT IV extended >Jim >I got my SAT IV this summer, and downloaded the disc in my computer. I asked Paul >several times how to use it, but like you, I found that the instructions weren't very >clear. It's probably that, like you, I am not very smart when it comes to technical >things like this. I am going to take my lap top and SAT IV with me to Las Vegas this >summer, and ask for a hands on instructions. >Other than that, I like my new toy. The FAC works like the others, but the display is >easier to read, especially when it's lit up. It's also nice have the name and model of >pianos in the pre-programmed pages, so that I don't have to get the work sheet out >every time. I think the weight is about the same, but the fact that it closes up >makes it sturdier. However, I think the battery time is a little shorter. Also, the >machine doesn't give much warning when the battery is low. I get about 5 minutes, >and then it shuts off. Whereas with the SAT III, I could still do two pianos after the >low bat sign would go on, before it would shut down. >Wim >-----Original Message----- >From: James Grebe <jamesgrebe at charter.net> >To: Pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org> >Sent: Sun, Dec 27, 2009 9:23 am >Subject: [pianotech] SAT IV extended >I have been using the new machine for about 4 months now and have yet to figure >out how to reliably put tunings in the machines EXTENDED memory. Have any of you >figured this process out yet?. >Thanks, >James >James Grebe Est. 1962 >Piano Tuner-Technician >Creator of Custom Caster Cups >Creator of fine Writing Instruments >www.grebepiano.com >1526 Raspberry Lane >Arnold, MO 63010 >(314) 608-4137 >Become what you believe
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC