On Jan 31, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Susan Kline wrote: > The contest was between two completely honorable people, of course. > > However, do you think he would have accepted the contest if he had known > ahead of time that his SAT wouldn't be able to generate an excellent tuning on > the piano in question? It's not dishonest for him to know ahead of time > that the contest was between Virgil at his best and the SAT at its best. > They obviously didn't want to set up the test using matching spinets. Susan, I don't think anything about either of these two persons intentions or what they might have known about beforehand. As I recall, actually being there in person, the two pianos were Kawai grands of about 6' or less. And if I am not mistaken, Kawai grands, generally speaking, have one of the best scale designs in the industry. That is why, according to a passing comment made by Jim Harvey, RPT, in a class I attended once upon a time, that the name, K. Kawai, is used on the grands, but only Kawai is used on the verticals. You or others can deduce what you want. Of course, I am more than willing to admit that I am no expert on these matters. In fact, I am even willing to admit that I am not an expert in anything. Honorable or not, these two dudes are beyond reproach. How is it customarily said? In my opinion, Keith
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC