[pianotech] Horse and buggy users.

tnrwim at aol.com tnrwim at aol.com
Wed Jul 20 11:12:02 MDT 2011




My membership DOES NOT come into play in this discussion - SO - just drop it.
FYI, I was a member until I could not afford the dues and the overall subject 
atter did not include much about the 
ntique player systems.
PLUS, as in what a lot of other persons are saying, who gives a rats arse about 
he home office - to us (non-members 
ncluded), it's all about the tech list (functionality, ease of use, syncing 
ith other devices, etc)
Duaine

First, regarding membership. Although the PTG does not concentrate on antique player systems, there are discussions about them once in a while, just as you only occasionally tune, and there are discussions about that, too. Dues are what they are. Perhaps if you took full advantage of what the dues will get you, membership might actually be worth it. The best example of this was the recent convention. There were no classes specifically on player systems, but there were many classes related to upright and grand repairs and regulations. After all, what good does it to repair the player system if the piano itself doesn't work. And of course, there were lots of classes on tuning, including using your favorite ETD. I even invited you to one of my tutoring sessions, at no cost, but didn't take advantage.  

As far as the home office is concerned, you had better care, because without them, we wouldn't be here. Well, we might be here, but can you imagine having one of us run this organization out of our office, instead of having dedicated professionals to it for us. Which, I learned in a class on the history of PTG at the convention, it used be. Members processing paperwork, editing Journals, and basically keeping the organization running. 

The fact that you are even able to participate in this list, Duaine, is entirely due to volunteers in the PTG, who pay dues, and Home Office Staff, dedicating their time to keep this list, and the others, available for piano tuners like your self. We appreciate and welcome your technical discussions, but please keep your misguided personal opinions about the lists, and the PTG, to yourself. 

Wim



-----Original Message-----
From: Duaine Hechler <dahechler at att.net>
To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Wed, Jul 20, 2011 6:02 am
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Horse and buggy users.


Again, William,
My membership DOES NOT come into play in this discussion - SO - just drop it.
FYI, I was a member until I could not afford the dues and the overall subject 
atter did not include much about the 
ntique player systems.
PLUS, as in what a lot of other persons are saying, who gives a rats arse about 
he home office - to us (non-members 
ncluded), it's all about the tech list (functionality, ease of use, syncing 
ith other devices, etc)
Duaine
On 07/20/2011 10:45 AM, William Monroe wrote:
 Again, Duaine,

 It goes beyond the list serv and it's function.  It encompasses all of the PTG 
rganizational functions as well.

 As a non-member I can see how that is meaningless to you, but to some of us it 
oes matter.

 William R. Monroe




 On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Duaine Hechler <dahechler at att.net 
mailto:dahechler at att.net>> wrote:

     Here we go again .........

     I thought this subject was supposed to be banned - I know I got my last 
mail "slapped" for bringing this up again.

     So now that it is here again, I'll chime in again.

     Comparison of the new list, is like the Edsel.

     It was ahead of it's time ..... not well accepted ..... and became a rare 
ntique very quickly.

     I see the new list going in the same direction.

     As you can see, this was submitted under the old list - only.

     Regards, Duaine

     P.S. What happened to the old adage - "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" 
!?!?!?!?

     On 07/20/2011 09:11 AM, William Monroe wrote:

         Will,

         I can't say that I condone Israel's approach to "encouraging" everyone 
o use the new system.  I can say,
         however, that your suggestion, you quoted,

         "If a thing can be done adequately by means of one, it is superfluous 
o do it by means of several; for we
         observe that nature does not employ two instruments [if] one suffice”.  
hat’s a pretty good measure for any
         software interface design.  By that measure, to claim that the new HL 
orum software represents a paradigm
         shift is laughable."

         It is essential that everyone who reads this forum (and who will 
ventually be using the new system)
         understands that the paradigm shift (it really is) reaches far beyond 
mail lists.  The new software works
         wonderfully for so much of what the home office needs it to do to 
rack and maintain membership,
         communications, and the integrating so many needs for the organization 
 of which the email list is only one.

         Please understand, I value the list as much as anyone, and I don't 
ean to imply that the new system is as
         simple as the old.  Neither do I intend to denigrate any of it's 
sers.  However, there are other
         considerations for PTG besides the list.  The new software does a 
emarkable job filling the needs of the PTG
         and incorporating the lists as well.  I'll say it again because it is 
xtremely important that we on the list
         fully understand:  the needs of PTG are much more than just the list.

         To be sure, the list is important and it was considered.  And, it does 
ontinue to function on the new
         software.  It is absolutely different.  It is in some ways more 
roublesome.  It is in some ways better.  List
         folks (and I include myself in that number) need to move past the 
nitial frustrations, log on, take the time
         to get set up as your needs see fit, and learn to use it.  If we 
imply refuse to use it, it will never work
         for us.  I'm discovering that as I use it more, it becomes vastly 
impler.

         Again, the new software is a big step forward for the PTG on the 
rganizational level.  It may complicate the
         list function for a bit until we all take the time to learn to use it 
ffectively, but it will happen.

         William R. Monroe




         On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Encore Pianos <encorepianos at metrocast.net 
mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net>
         <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net>>> 
rote:

            Dear Isreal:

            Hmmmm….     “:fellow luddites”, “horse and buggy drivers 
omplaining how difficult it is to start a car”,
            “horseshit”, “can the attitude”, “small but loud group who refuse 
o develop basic web skills” “files YOU
         PEOPLE
            were shoving onto my computer (caps added by me, wow, a conspiracy, 
hat fun!)  “massaging each other’s egos”

            And now for the real kicker, “the relatively minor glitches that 
ny paradigm shift entails”.   PARADIGM
            SHIFT?????!!!!!!!!,  Isn’t that a bit like a 2 ½  foot tall guy 
unking the ball into a basket 2 feet off the
            ground and claiming “player of the year?”

            Jon Page doesn’t need me to defend him and I won’t speak for him.  
 will say that I have met Jon and spent a
            little time with him, and have followed his posts on the forum over 
he past years.  Somehow, luddite  never
            enters my mind when I think of Jon.  And please note that the group 
f people you describe as luddites and
         horse
            and buggy drivers includes the following people, if we are 
ncluding those who have expressed their lack of
            enthusiasm for the new forum:   Del Fandrich, Ron Nossaman, Dale 
rwin, David Andersen,  and David Love;
         amongst
            many ohers.

            I admire both Del and Ron for their approach to problem solving and 
esign, because they so well apply these
            variations on “Occam’s Razor”,   “Simplicity is the ultimate 
ophistication” and “Entities must not be
         multiplied
            beyond necessity”.  It is always  a sign of an elegant and 
enetrating mind to seek the simplest and most
          direct
            solution.that fulfills all necessary criteria.

            I think this saying from Saint Thomas Aquinas is most topical when 
hinking of software, particularly the HL
            PIanotech web software: "If a thing can be done adequately by means 
f one, it is superfluous to do it by
         means of
            several; for we observe that nature does not employ two instruments 
if] one suffice”.  That’s a pretty good
            measure for any software interface design.  By that measure, to 
laim that the new HL forum software
         represents a
            paradigm shift is laughable.

            Will Truitt



     -- 
     Duaine Hechler
     Piano, Player Piano, Pump Organ
     Tuning, Servicing&  Rebuilding
     Reed Organ Society Member
     Florissant, MO 63034
     (314) 838-5587 <tel:%28314%29%20838-5587>
     dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net>
     www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com <http://www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com>
     --
     Home&  Business user of Linux - 11 years




- 
uaine Hechler
iano, Player Piano, Pump Organ
uning, Servicing&  Rebuilding
eed Organ Society Member
lorissant, MO 63034
314) 838-5587
ahechler at att.net
ww.hechlerpianoandorgan.com
-
ome&  Business user of Linux - 11 years

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20110720/8df64aad/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC