Guidelines/workload formula

[Wimblees@aol.com]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 2/1/02 3:54:37 PM Central Standard Time, vem@email.byu.edu 
writes:


> Question for you Wim:
> How can the numbers be accurate in your situation, i.e. 1.1 techs for your 
> university's situation, when it's going to take you two years to get 
> "caught 
> up" (dream on)?  Sounds to me like the formula is not working for your 
> situation.
> vince
> 
> 

As far as catching up, that is my own time table. Even my department chairman 
has told me I am working way to hard, that I don't have to get all the pianos 
in shape in the next two years. (perhaps that is a pipe dream, who knows)? 

I used the formula as is was devised, and did the math. As Dave mentioned, 
the formula doesn't take into consideration outsourcing. I also don't think 
the formula takes into consideration someone like me, who comes into a 
situation like I did. The way I used the formula was what the needs of a 
situation would be under "normal" conditions, and under the guidelines as 
prescribed. 

Wim

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/0a/6b/76/ee/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--