front or back

Mary Smith MarySmith@mail.utexas.edu
Wed, 3 Sep 2003 15:19:39 -0500


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Yes to what Eric said, plus I like to put the tricord wedge in front 
because it is easier to see, hence, to regulate. Remember to have the 
back lift a "tad" earlier than the front of the damper. This ensures 
that the wedge is resting fully on and in between the strings. The 
pad should be just resting on the strings.

Mary Smith
University of Texas at Austin

>Steinway puts the tricord in front, Baldwin has historically put it 
>in the back. I always put it in the front because we all know what 
>has happened to Baldwin (though I wouldn't blame it on where they 
>put their tricord felts) plus it seems that the string spacing would 
>be more regular in the front due to the agraffes. We have dozens of 
>Baldwin grands here and the dampers seem to work just fine with the 
>tricords in back.
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Eric Wolfley
>Head Piano Technician
>Cincinnati College-Conservatory of Music
>University of Cincinnati
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wimblees@aol.com [mailto:Wimblees@aol.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:07 PM
>To: caut@ptg.org
>Subject: front or back
>
>In the midsection, do we put the trichord felt in front, and the pad 
>in the back, or the other way around?
>
>Wim


-- 
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/ca/ab/ea/64/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC