Greetings, I will compile several responses to my "slamming" the little, cheap, PSO's, and would like to say right off the front that those that disagree with my point have as valid a position as I. This would be a boring and useless list if we all had the same opinions and perspectives. #1: Carl writes: >>You are right that Ferrari mechanics make more money because their owners like to brag to their friends how much it costs to fix it every other week whereas the vw owners brag how cheap their cars are to run.<< Forgive me for disparaging Volkswagons. I had one too, but the point was that the Ferrarri mechanics make more money in an hour than a VW grease monkey because there are a lot fewer people that can successfully work on them, the tolerances and demands are greater, and the cost of incompetance is far higher. A mistake on a VW is very cheap to repair. (ow,ow, ow, I done inflamed the Beetle crowd, sorry, and if there needs to be more beating about this, let's start a different thread.) Carl again: >>The primary function of a piano is to produce good music. The secondary goal should be appearance and snob appeal. << I agree, however, the majority of consoles and spinets I saw were rarely played, having been purchased for (what I think I remember) Loesser calls in his book "Men, Women,and Pianos", "The attempt to purchase culture". These were instruments that were sold on the strengths of their cabinet style more so than their stringing scales. ( a Winter spinet in Mediterranean Pecan?) Keith writes: I fail to comprehend your reasoning, Ed. In less I greatly misunderstand you, to imply specializing in grands as some type of intended goal and as being professional work, and the other type work you mention as something other, is not rational thought. << Hmm, it appears thatwe have different perspectives, but I don't think either of them are irrational. Both types of pianos represent professional work. >>While specializing in grands can be its own reward for some, I could never consider it a great day to reach that place, and that place only, unless that became a specific calling.<< That was my point, ( and I was making a personal point with that sentence). For me, it was a specific calling, given even more impetus by the repetitive stress injuries I suffered from tuning uprights. I am naturally competitive, and getting the high-end customers with high-end quality work was a means I had of gauging myself as I built my business. >>All the places, people, and pianos I would miss out on experiencing to be *that* professional. <snip> I am grateful there are those who do specialize in specific areas where the need exists, but it's certainly not for everyone, nor a necessarily, desirable goal either.<< For some, it is not a goal at all, for others, it is an unavoidable path. Time is a finite resource and at some point in our life, when there will is little time left, its value will be tremendous. Most resources owe their value to their relative scarcity, and when a beginning tradesman has more time than work, they can't really charge much. My point was, and is, that as we progress through our careers, gaining experience, we should try to make our time increasingly valuable, so that the experienced veteran's time is worth more than the beginner. I know that in the beginning, as a green tech in a new town, I could only compete on price, which caused me to see a lot of cheap pianos. Looking back, it is evident that the quality of my work, the quality of the pianos I worked on, and the amount of money per hour that my market was willing to pay me were all inextricably linked to the same curve. I can understand that the wintry scene Acrosonic scenario Keith described can be of value, but would it have been lessened if the car was parked in a warm garage while the tuning was done on a concert grand inside? ( and would it be better or worse if that car was a Volkswagon?(:)}} Ok, so we have several different slants on this, so far, and while the tribe is gathered round striking matches to give me a hot-foote, what about others? Am I the only one that wanted to specialize, even to the exclusion of the smallest, least costly pianos? Regards to all, Ed Foote RPT
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC