Ron Nossaman wrote: > ,,,, and I'd sure hate to have to depend on and try to > anticipate the effects of this in the design. We have all heard absolutely > LUSCIOUS sounding pianos with compression crowned boards, and a lot of > truly WRETCHED sounding ones as well, and that's pretty much a distillation > of the campaign for rib crowning. Relative predictability and some design > control of the final acoustic characteristics of the board, dependable > longevity of the system, and some freedom from the dependence on the > density and EMC reactivity of the panel are the benefits of rib crowning. > With a decent design, the overall sound can be kept more toward the > "luscious" end of the spectrum, and with a narrower statistical deviation. > That's for me! > > Ron N Ron.... just curious.... would it be correct to take the above paragraph to mean that in some kind of random (btim unforseeable and unexplainable) manner a compression soundboard can in some instances deliver a sound that surpasses that one is capable of producing in the more controllable rib crowned method ?? If so... how do you explain this ??.. I mean what (kind of optimization ??) would be able to account for this ? just curious... sounds almost borderline mystic.... grin. -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC