---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment In a message dated 10/16/2002 11:38:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, bases-loaded@juno.com writes: > Subj:Re: Piano Lac Finish > Date:10/16/2002 11:38:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:bases-loaded@juno.com">bases-loaded@juno.com</A> > Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > Sent from the Internet > Mark Thank you so much for this description. It was imenseley helpful. I just finished another mahogony sample board this am. Although it still had some open grain from spraying to heavy it came out fairly well untill I got to the final rubout. With nitro cell we sand the final gloss coats with 600 wet then finish with steel wool and polish for a semi but glossyier than semi gloss appearance . We get a very translucent finish starting out with a water dye. But when trying a similar rubout on the water base gloss the end result is not as clear but kind of hazy. It's much better than when we first started. Mr. Gutlo sent me a mahogony piece nicely polished and the clarity is stunning but I don't wish to do polished finnishes. So my question is what kind of rubout are you doing. How's the clarity? Whats the process? I'll can't except anything muddy / hazy looking myself. By the way what product are you using???????? Thanks again. Still grinding away in Modesto>>>>Dale Erwin > > . > Hi Thump - > > (To be clear, in the following reply I am not referring to Pianolac > specifically, a finish I have never tried, but rather to water-based > lacquer in general, and I HAVE used quite a few of them.) > > Like riding a bike, I think you could read forever on the subject of > spraying and only gain insight by experience alone. I think Dale's > experience illustrates what I was referring to rather succinctly. "Stuff > just happens", and even more so when you are coming to something for the > first time. In addition, the chemistry of the Water-based materials make > them a bit of an odd critter to spray if one has spent years spraying > solvent-based, making the application seem counter-intuitive in many > ways. Basically most of it comes down to more control over your > technique with the gun, and attention to proper atomization of the > product. I think the stuff is considerably less forgiving that way than > nitro, and only part of that is due to the high solids content of the > material. Put another way, I guess you could say it is a more complex > finish. "Spraying water-based 101" would be a class solely devoted to > not only learning how much material to apply in a pass, but would include > learning to know what it "looks like" on the surface when wet. Your > experience from nitro tells you there is not nearly enough material on > there because it looks uneven, with craters and orange peel waiting to > rear their ugly heads. The leveling takes place in a coalescing fashion > dissimilar from nitro, so it can be visually disconcerting. > Consequently, there is a tendency to apply either too little or too much > in compensation until you have had enough hands-on experience to tell you > otherwise. Only by familiarizing yourself with the product by use would > you have any hope of becoming efficient with it, but to me it was well > worth the effort. I have very few unpleasant surprises these days, and > certainly no more than one would have applying any finish. > > Mark Potter > bases-loaded ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/3a/f4/11/77/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC